宅男噜噜噜66在线观

Let's go on to discuss design patterns. In the previous article, I finished five creative patterns. At the beginning of this chapter, I will talk about the following seven structural patterns: adapter pattern, decoration pattern, agent pattern, appearance pattern, bridging pattern, combination pattern and meta-sharing pattern. The adapter pattern of the object is the origin of various patterns. Let's look at the following figure:林队长，此去责任重大，本将军就不多说了。郑老太太等人却是不理。漂啊漂，这次要漂到九州了。One last thing on this subject, The 7.62 mm traced armour-piercing firebombs fired by the 81-1 family, Although the name is a little long, But compared with ordinary munitions, The difference is still well understood: Tracing and burning are simple, Is to add two corresponding drugs, The armor piercing is to replace the steel core behind the bullet's brass back armor (also known as bullet head) with a harder tungsten alloy core with stronger penetration to hard targets. The latter is also the tail-stabilized shelling penetrator used on the third generation of modern main battle tanks (abbreviation: APFSDS) is one of the two main materials (the other is the notorious, highly radioactive depleted uranium penetrator core, The user country is mainly the United States, while China mainly uses tungsten alloy penetrators, Less pollution and better performance, The United States does not need to. First, the United States does not pass the standard of tungsten treatment technology. Far from the level of our country, Secondly, the United States is a tungsten-poor country. It also wants to fully use tungsten alloy bombs, But it can't be used, But as a nuclear Power, There is a lot of depleted uranium as nuclear waste, so depleted uranium is selected as a substitute. As for tungsten alloy and depleted uranium, after putting aside the key additional condition of radioactive pollution, the pure question of who is better in armour-piercing performance is not directly related to this article, so it will not be described in detail).My friend in the middle of the 6th floor reminded me that the damage caused by poison specialization is 25% and that by fire specialization is 40%. The difference of 15% is here. It turns out that poison injury flow is an element injury entry that is inherently 15% worse than fire injury flow. Now we don't have to worry about who is higher than the poison fire. Under the same entry, enchantment damage is the same, but under the same condition of level 3 passivity, fire damage is inherently higher than poison. Is there anyone who wonders whether fire or poison is more harmful? It's meaningless to mention debuff. Bows and arrows are dead when debuff is finished. However, if we really go through the chaotic ring of debuff flow, the defense reduced by poison will be perfectly offset by the burning dot. Most of the time, burning a 30W poison can't make up for it. Therefore, the conclusion is that in most cases, fire injury is higher than poison injury.经过一段时间休息之后，周徐两家的家将体能都恢复一些，再次踏上艰难的搜寻之路，势必要尽快找到越王尹旭才行。